Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of Aluminium Alloys: A Comprehensive Review

Table of Contents

  1. Introduction
    1.1. Overview of Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing
    1.2. Importance of Aluminium Alloys
    1.3. Industry Relevance
    1.4. Introduction Conclusion
  2. Fundamentals of WAAM
    2.1. Basic Principles and History
    2.2. Wire Feedstock and Energy Sources
    2.3. Process Variants: CMT, CMT-ADV, and CMT-PADV
    2.4. Comparison with Other Additive Techniques
  3. Process Parameters and Their Influence
    3.1. Heat Input and Energy Input per Unit Length
    3.2. Welding Speed, Wire Feed Rate, and Shielding Gas
    3.3. Control of Porosity and Final Contour
    3.4. Temperature–Time Profiles and Cooling Rates
  4. Material Characteristics and Microstructure
    4.1. Chemical Composition and Alloy Selection
    4.2. Grain Structure, Size, and Texture
    4.3. Effects of Arc Modes on Microstructure
    4.4. Data Table: Chemical Composition of Substrate and Welding Wire
  5. Mechanical Properties and Performance
    5.1. Hardness, Tensile Strength, and Yield Stress
    5.2. Anisotropy and Directional Behavior
    5.3. Case Study: WAAM of AlMg5Mn
    5.4. Data Table: Mechanical Properties of WAAM Fabricated Alloys
  6. Real-World Applications and Case Studies
    6.1. Aerospace and Automotive Examples
    6.2. Repair and Maintenance Applications
    6.3. Economic and Time-Saving Benefits
    6.4. Discussion of Successful Case Studies
  7. Challenges and Future Trends
    7.1. Porosity, Cracking, and Defect Mitigation
    7.2. Process Optimization and Digital Control
    7.3. Development of Tailored Aluminium Alloys for WAAM
    7.4. Emerging Technologies and Research Directions
  8. Conclusions
  9. References
  10. Article Meta Information and Word Count

1. Introduction

Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) is an advanced metal‐fabrication technique that builds near‐net‐shape parts through the layer‐by‐layer deposition of molten metal. By using an electric arc to melt a continuously fed wire, WAAM offers high deposition rates, lower production costs, and nearly unlimited build volumes compared to powder‐based methods. Its ability to produce large, complex components has made it a focus of both academic research and industrial application.

Aluminium alloys, prized for their low density, high specific strength, excellent thermal conductivity, and corrosion resistance, are central to modern industries such as aerospace, automotive, and marine engineering. Traditional manufacturing methods—casting, milling, and forging—often result in material waste and limited design freedom. WAAM addresses these challenges by enabling the creation of lightweight, high‐performance structures while improving material utilization and reducing lead times.

In this article, we explore the fundamentals of WAAM as applied to aluminium alloys. We discuss the influence of key process parameters—including heat input, welding speed, wire feed rate, and shielding gas composition—on microstructure, porosity, and mechanical properties. We then review case studies and real‐world applications that highlight the process’s advantages and discuss challenges and future research trends.

Elka Mehr Kimiya is a leading manufacturer of Aluminium rods, alloys, conductors, ingots, and wire in the northwest of Iran equipped with cutting-edge production machinery. Committed to excellence, we ensure top-quality products through precision engineering and rigorous quality control.


2. Fundamentals of WAAM

2.1. Basic Principles and History

Wire arc additive manufacturing (WAAM) evolved from traditional welding techniques and is one of the earliest forms of metal additive manufacturing. The process first gained recognition when engineers sought ways to rapidly build complex shapes by depositing molten metal in successive layers. Today, WAAM is regarded as a disruptive technology that offers high deposition rates—often measured in kilograms per hour—while keeping production costs low.

The WAAM process employs an electric arc (typically from a gas metal arc welding [GMAW] system) to melt a metal wire. The molten metal is deposited on a substrate where it quickly solidifies, forming a new layer. Repeating this process creates the desired three-dimensional component. This approach contrasts with powder-bed methods in that it uses a continuous feedstock (the wire) and a highly energetic arc, making it ideal for large components.

2.2. Wire Feedstock and Energy Sources

The quality of the feedstock is paramount in WAAM. Aluminium wires—often of alloys such as AlMg5Mn (also known as S Al 5556) or other commercially available aluminium alloys—must be free from contaminants and have uniform diameters to ensure consistent material flow and deposition. The wire is fed into the arc at a controlled rate and must melt uniformly for the deposited material to have a consistent microstructure.

Energy sources in WAAM are typically based on gas metal arc welding (GMAW) systems. Variations in the welding process have led to several advanced techniques, such as Cold Metal Transfer (CMT) and its variations:

  • CMT: Standard cold metal transfer offers stable droplet transfer with low heat input.
  • CMT-ADV: The advanced variant uses periodic polarity reversal to further control the energy input.
  • CMT-PADV: The pulse advanced version combines pulsed current cycles with polarity reversal, reducing heat input to the lowest level.

These advanced arc modes enable the control of key process parameters that influence the final part quality.

2.3. Process Variants: CMT, CMT-ADV, and CMT-PADV

In traditional CMT, a steady short-circuit transfer minimizes spatter while delivering a moderate amount of heat. However, innovations in arc control have led to the development of CMT-ADV and CMT-PADV. In CMT-ADV, the arc polarity is reversed cyclically; this technique cleans the weld pool and reduces heat input. CMT-PADV further refines this approach by superimposing pulsed currents during positive polarity cycles, thus lowering the overall energy delivered.

Studies have shown that the energy input per unit length can vary significantly among these modes. For instance, when operating at the same welding speed, the measured energy input per unit length can decrease from approximately 3.67 kJ/cm with CMT to about 2.86 kJ/cm with CMT-PADV. These differences play a crucial role in controlling porosity, grain size, and other microstructural features.

2.4. Comparison with Other Additive Techniques

Compared to laser or electron beam-based additive manufacturing, WAAM offers:

  • Higher Deposition Rates: WAAM can deposit material at rates that are orders of magnitude greater than powder-bed fusion.
  • Lower Equipment Costs: The hardware used in WAAM is generally less expensive and easier to maintain.
  • Larger Build Volumes: WAAM does not require a vacuum chamber and can build very large parts.

While powder-based methods may yield finer surface finishes, WAAM’s near-net-shape production allows for the creation of large structural components with post-processing steps to refine surfaces as needed.


3. Process Parameters and Their Influence

The performance of a WAAM process is determined by numerous controllable parameters. In this section, we discuss how heat input, welding speed, wire feed rate, and shielding gas composition influence the resulting deposition.

3.1. Heat Input and Energy Input per Unit Length

Heat input is a critical factor in controlling the quality of the weld bead and the final part. It is defined as the energy delivered per unit length of the weld and depends on welding current (I), voltage (U), and travel speed (v). The energy input per unit length, EsE_sEs​, can be expressed as:Es=τ×U×IvE_s = \frac{\tau \times U \times I}{v}Es​=vτ×U×I​

where

  • τ\tauτ is the power coefficient,
  • UUU is the arc voltage,
  • III is the welding current, and
  • vvv is the welding speed.

Lower heat input typically reduces the size of the melt pool and promotes faster solidification, resulting in a finer microstructure with reduced porosity. In contrast, excessive heat input may lead to coarser grains, increased porosity, and a loss of dimensional accuracy due to excessive melt flow.

Advanced arc modes like CMT-ADV and CMT-PADV reduce the effective heat input compared to standard CMT. For example, studies have shown that CMT-PADV can reduce the energy input per unit length by nearly 22–33% compared to the standard CMT mode.

3.2. Welding Speed, Wire Feed Rate, and Shielding Gas

Welding Speed:
A lower welding speed increases the dwell time of the heat source, raising the energy input and causing a wider, flatter bead with greater penetration. However, this can also lead to more porosity if the melt pool remains hot for too long, allowing gas bubbles to become trapped.

Wire Feed Rate:
A consistent wire feed rate is essential for uniform deposition. If the feed rate is too high or too low relative to the welding speed, inconsistent melting can occur, leading to defects such as incomplete fusion or excessive spatter.

Shielding Gas:
Shielding gases protect the molten metal from oxidation. Pure argon is commonly used because of its high density, but mixtures (e.g., 70% argon and 30% helium) may be employed to modify the arc characteristics. Helium’s higher thermal conductivity can increase the heat of the arc and improve degassing, although it may also increase the bead width. The selection of shielding gas affects both the final microstructure and the porosity level in the deposited metal.

3.3. Control of Porosity and Final Contour

Porosity is one of the most critical defects in WAAM. It is influenced by:

  • Heat Input: Lower heat input minimizes the time available for gas bubbles to nucleate and grow.
  • Arc Mode: Modes with alternating polarity (CMT-ADV, CMT-PADV) have been found to reduce porosity significantly.
  • First-Layer Strategy: Adjusting the welding speed and using a helium-containing shielding gas for the initial layers can enhance bonding to the substrate and reduce porosity by increasing degassing and improving bead geometry.

In experimental studies, the area percentage of porosity was reduced from values as high as 0.35% with standard CMT to as low as 0.06% using CMT-PADV.

3.4. Temperature–Time Profiles and Cooling Rates

Each layer’s temperature–time profile impacts the resulting microstructure. As new layers are deposited, previously built layers undergo reheating. The cooling rate—especially the rate from 500 °C to 300 °C—affects grain growth. Near the substrate, where the temperature gradient is steep and heat conduction is rapid, the cooling rate is much higher, leading to a finer grain structure. As the build height increases, the cooling rate decreases due to reduced heat conduction and greater reliance on convection and radiation, which can result in coarser microstructure if not controlled.


4. Material Characteristics and Microstructure

4.1. Chemical Composition and Alloy Selection

Aluminium alloys are tailored with additions of magnesium, silicon, copper, manganese, and other elements to achieve desired properties. For WAAM, feedstock such as S Al 5556 (AlMg5Mn) is commonly used for its good weldability, high strength, and balanced mechanical properties. The chemical composition of both the substrate and the welding wire plays a critical role in determining weldability, microstructure, and the tendency for defects.

Below is an example table summarizing the chemical composition of a typical substrate and welding wire used in WAAM of aluminium alloys:

Table 1. Chemical Composition of Substrate and Welding Wire (wt %)

MaterialFunctionSiFeCuMnMgCrZnTiAl (Balance)
EN AW-5754A H111Substrate0.40.40.10.52.6–3.60.30.20.15Bal.
S Al 5556Welding Wire0.060.180.0090.75.30.080.010.08Bal.

Source: Adapted from technical data sheets and literature [33,34].

4.2. Grain Structure, Size, and Texture

The microstructure of WAAM-fabricated aluminium parts is largely determined by the cooling rate and heat input during solidification. In regions with rapid cooling (such as near the substrate), columnar grains may form due to a high temperature gradient. As heat input is reduced (as seen in advanced arc modes), a finer, more globulitic or equiaxed grain structure develops.

Studies have demonstrated that:

  • Standard CMT produces a relatively coarse, columnar grain structure.
  • CMT-ADV yields a finer microstructure with reduced porosity.
  • CMT-PADV produces the finest grain structure, with average grain sizes reduced by nearly 20–25% compared to the standard process.

The finer grain structure not only improves mechanical properties (by increasing hardness and tensile strength) but also leads to more isotropic properties.

4.3. Effects of Arc Modes on Microstructure

Advanced arc modes such as CMT-ADV and CMT-PADV influence the melt pool dynamics by introducing periodic polarity changes and pulsed currents. These variations induce oscillatory turbulence in the melt, which breaks up columnar dendrites and creates additional nucleation sites. The result is a refined microstructure with a uniform distribution of grain sizes. Moreover, the lower overall heat input minimizes grain growth during solidification, preserving fine microstructural features.

4.4. Data Table: Chemical Composition and Process-Related Parameters

Below is a summary table that combines chemical composition with selected process parameters and their effects on microstructure and porosity.

Table 2. Process and Material Parameters in WAAM of Aluminium Alloys

ParameterStandard CMTCMT-ADVCMT-PADV
Energy Input (kJ/cm)~3.67~3.08~2.86
Average Grain Size (µm)~63.3 (lower)~56.2–68.7~48.7–53.4
Porosity (Area %)Up to 0.35%~0.07–0.29%~0.06%
Weld Penetration (Relative)HighModerateLower
Final Contour RegularityModerateLower irregularityBest (lowest waviness)
Build Time (min)*320250 (−22%)215 (−33%)

*Based on a large-volume wall buildup study.

Sources: Adapted from multiple studies [11,14,20,28].


5. Mechanical Properties and Performance

5.1. Hardness, Tensile Strength, and Yield Stress

Mechanical performance is crucial for structural applications. WAAM-fabricated aluminium parts are evaluated by measuring hardness, tensile strength, yield strength, and elongation. Generally, a finer microstructure obtained via advanced arc modes translates into higher hardness and improved tensile properties.

For example, experiments on AlMg5Mn have demonstrated:

  • Hardness:
    • Standard CMT: ~81.4 HV1
    • CMT-ADV: ~83.4 HV1
    • CMT-PADV: ~85 HV1
  • Tensile Strength (Horizontal Specimens):
    • Approximately 294 MPa (with minor fluctuations between arc modes)
  • Elongation to Fracture:
    • Around 28–29% for horizontally oriented specimens

Vertical specimens (built in the buildup direction) typically show lower tensile strength and ductility due to porosity concentrating at the interlayer boundaries. With standard CMT, the vertical tensile strength may drop by 20–26 MPa compared to horizontal samples, whereas CMT-PADV shows nearly isotropic behavior.

5.2. Anisotropy and Directional Behavior

An important observation in WAAM-produced parts is the directional dependence of mechanical properties. Horizontal samples (parallel to the weld bead) tend to exhibit higher ductility and strength compared to vertical samples (across layer boundaries), mainly due to the presence of porosity and weak bonding between layers. The use of advanced arc modes minimizes these anisotropic effects by reducing porosity and promoting a homogeneous microstructure.

5.3. Case Study: WAAM of AlMg5Mn

One detailed study examined the WAAM process using AlMg5Mn with various arc modes. In this case, multilayer walls were produced using standard CMT, CMT-ADV, and CMT-PADV. The findings included:

  • Final Contour:
    • CMT-PADV yielded the smoothest side profile with material utilization as high as 80%.
  • Build Time Reduction:
    • CMT-PADV reduced build time by approximately 33% compared to standard CMT.
  • Mechanical Performance:
    • Horizontal tensile strengths were around 294 MPa for all modes, while vertical properties were nearly equal for CMT-PADV.
  • Porosity:
    • CMT-PADV resulted in porosity as low as 0.06%, versus up to 0.35% in standard CMT.

These results demonstrate that by fine-tuning the arc mode and process parameters, WAAM can produce aluminium components with mechanical properties that meet or exceed industry standards.

5.4. Data Table: Mechanical Properties of WAAM-Fabricated Aluminium Alloys

The following table summarizes typical mechanical properties for WAAM-fabricated aluminium alloy samples using different arc modes:

Table 3. Mechanical Properties Comparison (WAAM Using Various Arc Modes)

PropertyStandard Weld Metal*WAAM (CMT)WAAM (CMT-ADV)WAAM (CMT-PADV)
Ultimate Tensile Strength (MPa)275 MPa292.8 ± 2.0 MPa293.8 ± 2.7 MPa294.2 ± 3.0 MPa
0.2% Proof Stress (MPa)125 MPa~125–128 MPa~128 MPa~131.8 ± 4.4 MPa
Elongation to Fracture (%)17%28.6 ± 1.2% (H); 15.6 ± 0.9% (V)28.5 ± 1.5% (H); 21.2 ± 3% (V)28.5 ± 1.5% (H); 28.0 ± 1.0% (V)
Hardness (HV1)81.4 HV183.4 HV185.0 HV1

*Manufacturer’s specification for pure weld metal.

*Sources: Adapted from experimental studies [14,28,32].


6. Real-World Applications and Case Studies

6.1. Aerospace and Automotive Examples

WAAM is being successfully deployed in industries where large, complex parts are required. In aerospace, for instance, WAAM has been used to manufacture wing ribs, fuselage components, and even full-scale structural elements. Automotive applications include lightweight chassis components, engine brackets, and structural reinforcements. The ability to fabricate near-net-shape parts not only cuts machining time but also significantly reduces material waste.

6.2. Repair and Maintenance Applications

Another significant application of WAAM is in the repair and refurbishment of worn or damaged components. Instead of scrapping an entire part, WAAM can deposit a new layer onto the damaged area, restoring functionality while reducing downtime and cost. For example, in marine and offshore industries, WAAM has been used to repair corroded aluminium structural members.

6.3. Economic and Time-Saving Benefits

WAAM offers significant economic advantages:

  • High Material Utilization: Material efficiency can exceed 90%, reducing waste.
  • Shorter Build Times: As seen in comparative studies, using CMT-PADV can reduce build times by up to 33% compared to standard CMT.
  • Lower Investment Costs: WAAM equipment is less expensive than high-end laser or electron beam systems, making the technology accessible for small and medium enterprises.

6.4. Discussion of Successful Case Studies

One case study on AlMg5Mn WAAM demonstrated that by using a modified first-layer strategy (reduced welding speed and an argon–helium mixture), both the porosity and the final contour could be optimized. The study showed a reduction in porosity from over 0.3% in standard builds to below 0.1% and improved bonding at the substrate interface.

Another example comes from aerospace manufacturing, where WAAM was used to produce a 6-meter-long high-strength aluminium wing beam. The process reduced both production time and material waste compared to conventional milling from a billet, illustrating the potential of WAAM for large structural components.


7. Challenges and Future Trends

7.1. Porosity, Cracking, and Defect Mitigation

Despite many advantages, WAAM faces several challenges. Porosity remains a primary concern as trapped gases can lower mechanical strength and ductility. Inadequate fusion between layers can also lead to cracking, especially in vertical builds. The majority of defects occur at interlayer boundaries, where uneven reheating and cooling cycles create stress concentrations.
Future work must focus on improved in‐line monitoring, advanced cooling strategies (such as near immersion active cooling), and refined process controls to mitigate these defects.

7.2. Process Optimization and Digital Control

Digital control systems play an essential role in modern WAAM. Advanced slicing algorithms, precise path planning, and real-time process monitoring enable better control over deposition quality. Optimizing interpass temperatures and feedback-controlled welding speeds can further enhance quality.
The integration of simulation tools to model the temperature–time profile and thermal stresses will help predict and avoid defects. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are beginning to influence parameter optimization, making WAAM more robust and repeatable.

7.3. Development of Tailored Aluminium Alloys for WAAM

The alloy composition of the feedstock greatly influences weldability and the final microstructure. Most current aluminium wires were originally designed for conventional welding rather than for additive manufacturing. In the future, alloys will be specifically developed for WAAM to ensure:

  • Lower crack susceptibility,
  • Enhanced degassing behavior,
  • Superior mechanical properties with minimal post-processing.

Researchers are exploring microalloying additions (such as scandium, zirconium, and rare-earth elements) to refine grain structure and further improve performance.

7.4. Emerging Technologies and Research Directions

Ongoing research focuses on several emerging areas:

  • In-situ Process Monitoring: Real-time sensors and imaging systems can detect defects as they form, allowing for corrective actions during the build process.
  • Hybrid Manufacturing: Combining WAAM with subtractive processes or other additive techniques can lead to parts that require minimal post-processing.
  • Multi-Material WAAM: Future systems may allow the deposition of multiple materials in a single build, enabling functionally graded structures.
  • Sustainability and Energy Efficiency: Research into reducing energy input while maintaining quality will enhance the sustainability of WAAM processes.

8. Conclusions

Wire arc additive manufacturing of aluminium alloys represents a promising convergence of welding technology and 3-D printing. By carefully controlling process parameters such as heat input, welding speed, wire feed rate, and shielding gas composition, WAAM can produce large, high-performance components with excellent material utilization. Advanced arc modes like CMT-ADV and CMT-PADV have been shown to reduce porosity, refine the microstructure, and yield near-isotropic mechanical properties—key factors that are essential for critical applications in aerospace, automotive, and repair industries.

Real-world case studies have demonstrated that WAAM not only reduces production time and cost but also minimizes material waste compared to traditional manufacturing processes. However, challenges remain—particularly in controlling porosity and interlayer bonding. Future trends point toward enhanced digital control systems, tailored alloy development, and the integration of in-situ monitoring to further improve quality and reproducibility.

As research continues, the full potential of WAAM in producing complex aluminium components will be unlocked, making it an increasingly attractive option for a wide range of industrial applications.


9. References <a id=”references”></a>

  1. Dorn, L. “Schweißverhalten von Aluminium und seinen Legierungen.” Mater. Materialwissenschaft und Werkstofftechnik, vol. 29, 1998, pp. 412–423. doi:10.1002/mawe.19980290806.
  2. Grave, M. “Beitrag zum MIG- und WIG-Schweißen von Aluminiumlegierungen.” In Aachener Berichte Fügetechnik, vol. 3, Shaker Verlag, 1998.
  3. Attaran, M. “The Rise of 3-D Printing: The Advantages of Additive Manufacturing over Traditional Manufacturing.” Business Horizons, vol. 60, 2017, pp. 677–688. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2017.05.011.
  4. Ford, S., and Despeisse, M. “Additive Manufacturing and Sustainability: An Exploratory Study of the Advantages and Challenges.” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 137, 2016, pp. 1573–1587. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.150.
  5. González, J., et al. “Additive Manufacturing with GMAW Welding and CMT Technology.” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 13, 2017, pp. 840–847. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2017.09.189.
  6. Bai, J., et al. “Porosity Evolution in Additively Manufactured Aluminium Alloy during High Temperature Exposure.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, vol. 176, 2017, p. 012045. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/167/1/012045.
  7. Karunakaran, K.P., et al. “Low Cost Integration of Additive and Subtractive Processes for Hybrid Layer Manufacturing.” Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, vol. 26, 2010, pp. 490–499. doi:10.1016/j.rcim.2010.03.008.
  8. Veiga, F., et al. “Analysis of the Machining Process of Titanium Ti6Al-4V Parts Manufactured by Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing.” Materials, vol. 13, 2020, p. 766. doi:10.3390/ma13030766.
  9. Gu, J., et al. “Wire+Arc Additive Manufacturing of Aluminium.” In Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, University of Texas, 2014.
  10. Williams, S.W., et al. “Wire + Arc Additive Manufacturing.” Materials Science and Technology, vol. 32, 2015, pp. 451–458. doi:10.1179/1743284715Y.0000000073.
  11. Cong, B., et al. “Effect of Arc Mode in Cold Metal Transfer Process on Porosity of Additively Manufactured Al-6.3%Cu Alloy.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 76, 2015, pp. 1593–1606. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6346-x.
  12. Gu, J., et al. “The Effect of Inter-layer Cold Working and Post-deposition Heat Treatment on Porosity in Additively Manufactured Aluminium Alloys.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 230, 2016, pp. 26–34. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2015.11.006.
  13. Cong, B., et al. “A Comparative Study of Additively Manufactured Thin Wall and Block Structure with Al-6.3%Cu Alloy Using Cold Metal Transfer Process.” Applied Sciences, vol. 7, 2017, p. 275. doi:10.3390/app7030275.
  14. Fang, X., et al. “Microstructure Evolution and Mechanical Behavior of 2219 Aluminum Alloys Additively Fabricated by the Cold Metal Transfer Process.” Materials, vol. 11, 2018, p. 812. doi:10.3390/ma11050812.
  15. Zhang, C., et al. “Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing of Al-6Mg Alloy Using Variable Polarity Cold Metal Transfer Arc as Power Source.” Materials Science and Engineering Part A, vol. 711, 2018, pp. 415–423. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2017.11.084.
  16. Gu, J.L., et al. “The Influence of Wire Properties on the Quality and Performance of Wire+Arc Additively Manufactured Aluminium Parts.” Advanced Materials Research, vol. 1081, 2014, pp. 210–214. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1081.210.
  17. Ryan, E.M., et al. “The Influence of Build Parameters and Wire Batch on Porosity of Wire and Arc Additively Manufactured Aluminium Alloy 2319.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, vol. 262, 2018, pp. 577–584. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.07.030.
  18. Derekar, K.S., et al. “Influence of Interpass Temperature on Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) of Aluminium Alloy Components.” In Proceedings of the 71st IIW Annual Assembly and International Conference, 2018.
  19. Geng, H., et al. “Optimisation of Interpass Temperature and Heat Input for Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing 5A06 Aluminium Alloy.” Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, vol. 22, 2016, pp. 472–483. doi:10.1080/13621718.2016.1259031.
  20. Cong, B., et al. “Influence of Cold Metal Transfer Process and Its Heat Input on Weld Bead Geometry and Porosity of Aluminum-Copper Alloy Welds.” Rare Metals and Materials Engineering, vol. 45, 2016, pp. 606–611. doi:10.1016/S1875-5372(16)30080-7.
  21. Bruckner, J. Schweißpraxis aktuell: CMT-Technologie, Cold Metal Transfer – Ein neuer Metall-Schutzgas-Schweißprozess. WEKA MEDIA, 2013.
  22. Ammann, T., et al. Das Handbuch des Metall-Schutzgasschweißens, Verfahren, Werkstoffe, Fertigung, vol. 162, DVS Media, 2017.
  23. Ortega, A.G., et al. “Characterisation of 4043 Aluminium Alloy Deposits Obtained by Wire and Arc Additive Manufacturing Using a Cold Metal Transfer Process.” Science and Technology of Welding and Joining, vol. 24, 2019, pp. 538–547. doi:10.1080/13621718.2018.1564986.
  24. Gu, J., et al. “Microstructure, Defects and Mechanical Properties of Wire + Arc Additively Manufactured Al-Cu4.3-Mg1.5 Alloy.” Materials & Design, vol. 186, 2020, p. 109357. doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2019.108357.
  25. Ünsal, I., et al. “Material Properties of Features Produced from EN AW 6016 by Wire-Arc Additive Manufacturing.” Procedia Manufacturing, vol. 47, 2020, pp. 1129–1133. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2020.04.131.
  26. Morais, P.J., et al. “Characterisation of a High-Performance Al-Zn-Mg-Cu Alloy Designed for Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing.” Materials, vol. 13, 2020, p. 1610. doi:10.3390/ma13071610.
  27. Ostermann, F. Anwendungstechnologie Aluminium, 3rd ed., Springer Vieweg, 2014.
  28. Derekar, K.S., et al. “Effect of Pulsed Metal Inert Gas (Pulsed-MIG) and Cold Metal Transfer (CMT) Techniques on Hydrogen Dissolution in Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing (WAAM) of Aluminium.” International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, vol. 107, 2020, pp. 311–331. doi:10.1007/s00170-020-04946-2.
  29. Li, S., et al. “Comparative Study on the Microstructures and Properties of Wire+Arc Additively Manufactured 5356 Aluminium Alloy with Argon and Nitrogen as the Shielding Gas.” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 34, 2020, p. 101206. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2020.101206.
  30. Ostermann, F. Aluminium-Werkstofftechnik für den Automobilbau, Expert Verlag, 1992.
  31. Cunningham, C.R., et al. “Strategies and Processes for High Quality Wire Arc Additive Manufacturing.” Additive Manufacturing, vol. 22, 2018, pp. 672–686. doi:10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.020.
  32. Mayer, H., et al. “Influence of Porosity on the Fatigue Limit of Die Cast Magnesium and Aluminium Alloys.” International Journal of Fatigue, vol. 25, 2003, pp. 245–256. doi:10.1016/S0142-1123(02)00054-3.
  33. MIG WELD S.A.S.U. “Material Data Sheet S Al 5556 (AlMg5Mn)/ER 5556.” Available online: https://www.mig-weld.eu/ml-5556-almg5mn.
  34. CHEM-WELD International GmbH. “MIG/MAG Schweißdrähte Material Data Sheet S Al 5556 (AlMg5Mn) ER 5556.” Available online: http://www.chem-weld.com/downloads/chemweld_draehte.pdf.

No comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *